Check out the WineMaker trip to Chile & Argentina during next year’s harvest in March 2027. Reserve your spot now as spaces are filling fast!

wine-wizard

Sanitizing With Sulfur Dioxide and Citric Acid

Q: I am hoping you can resolve a discussion between fellow winemakers regarding sanitizing solutions. A simple, no-rinse solution is 1 tablespoon citric acid and 2 teaspoons KMBS (potassium metabisulfite) per gallon (3.8 L) of water. I use this all the time, and generally use de-ionized water. Understanding that an acid helps the sulfite to be more effective, could you explain: 1) Why this is the case, and 2) why tartaric may (or may not) be a better choice than citric given its already natural abundance in wine and less risk of citric acid metabolism complications during malolactic fermentation?
— Steve Meharg, PhD. • Longview, Washington

A: I’m happy to help clear up the argument for you. First, I have to say, “good on you” (as my New Zealand harvest interns used to say) for questioning what you hear; discussing vinous conundrums is how we learn! It’s so engaging to have these discussions with our winemaking peers, opening our minds to different views and ways of thinking; it happens in professional circles all the time! 

To answer the first question: Indeed, you are correct. Adding acid to a KMBS solution makes it more effective as a sanitizing agent. This is because the lower the pH, the higher the percentage of the two “biologically active” forms of sulfur dioxide — molecular SO2 and bisulfite (HSO3–) — you’ll have in your aqueous solution. These are the two forms that directly disrupt biological activity (which is what we’re trying to stop with sanitation in the first place) of spoilage yeast and bacteria. The higher the pH (meaning the lower the acidity), the higher concentration of KMBS powder you’d need to do the same job. Basically, the acid you’re adding forces more of the sulfur dioxide to exist in a more potent form. 

To answer your second question, my response is very simple: Cost. Tartaric acid is many times more expensive than citric acid, which is why, since it’ll just end up getting sprayed around the cellar and eventually going down the drain, most wineries of any size don’t use tartaric acid in sanitizing solutions and sprays.

However, as you know, home winemakers aren’t often as constrained by cost as large commercial establishments, so if you’ve got a bag of tartaric sitting around and you’d like to use it, go right ahead. Citric acid metabolism during malolactic fermentation is an uncommon (but significant) risk (causes carbon dioxide and some metabolic byproducts), but most wineries don’t worry too much about it. I’d wager that the amount of citric left sitting undissociated on dry equipment surfaces post-sanitation is small.

You might also like…

WIne glass as a question mark. wine-wizard

Managing Headspace

What’s the best way to manage headspace at the top of your aging carboy? Hint: It is not gas.

WIne glass as a question mark. wine-wizard

Recorking Bottles

What is the process for replacing compromised corks if the wine inside the bottle is still of high quality?

WIne glass as a question mark. wine-wizard

Relying on Pectic Enzymes

A reader asks if there is a downside to pre-treating all wines with pectic enzyme.

WIne glass as a question mark. wine-wizard

pH Adjustments

Is raising pH with potassium bicarbonate a good option?

Continue reading – Enter your email to log in or register

New to WineMaker? Create a free account to get our weekly newsletter and two free article webpage visits every month.

Yes! I would like to receive new content and updates.